Use cases
Each workflow begins with a defined key and ends with exceptions, owners, evidence and an export another reviewer can understand.
Problem: employee status, department, manager and location differ between HR and operational lists.
Workflow: map Employee Code to Emp ID, normalize text and compare controlled fields.
Output: missing employees, duplicate codes, conflicting attributes and an action register.
Problem: serial numbers appear across dispatch, received and vendor registers with inconsistent ownership.
Workflow: use Serial Number as the key and Employee Code as a comparison field across three sources.
Output: in-transit, unreturned, duplicate-assigned and conflicting-status assets.
Problem: invoice, purchase and payment exports use different header names and formats.
Workflow: map Invoice ID, normalize amount/date fields and compare payment status.
Output: unpaid, part-paid, unallocated and amount-conflict records.
Problem: the cash ledger and bank statement contain timing items, charges and unmatched references.
Workflow: compare transaction reference, amount and date with controlled tolerances outside the key.
Output: unmatched ledger items, statement-only entries and amount/date conflicts.
Problem: approved changes do not align with payroll input and prior-period totals.
Workflow: use Employee Code and Pay Period, compare pay components and assign material exceptions.
Output: new starters, leavers, unexplained variances and reviewer notes.
Problem: order, processor, refund and bank sources do not share one schema.
Workflow: select a master source, map transaction identifiers and compare three or four sources.
Output: unsettled orders, unmatched refunds, fee conflicts and executive monthly totals.