Editorial standards
How ReconNimble tests spreadsheet guidance before publication
Complete drafts are not automatically public. A guide must pass content, metadata, source, testing, image and FAQ checks and then receive deliberate human approval.
Formula fixtures
Supported formula families are tested for Excel and Google Sheets where behaviour differs. Fixtures cover exact match, missing values, locked ranges, dynamic headers and normalized permalink signatures.
Reconciliation fixtures
CSV, TSV and XLSX fixtures cover reordered rows, different header names, missing records, duplicate keys, numeric/date normalization, field conflicts, multi-source presence and bounded fuzzy candidates.
Author and reviewer accountability
Every guide record identifies an author and reviewer, contains visible source and testing notes and stores reviewed and published dates separately. An editor can return a draft to Review when the live product or documentation changes.
Images and downloads
Each launch draft includes a unique lightweight illustration with dimensions and alt text. Downloadable workbooks contain fictional sample data and instructions; the VLOOKUP PDF is rendered and visually inspected before packaging.
Corrections and limitations
Material corrections update the reviewed date. We do not publish fake customer claims, fake expert identities, invented time-saved totals or a formula as proof of business correctness. Formula, Excel-version, locale and plan limitations are visible where they affect decisions.
Launch publication state
The package contains thirteen substantial guide drafts in Review status. They remain outside the sitemap and public guide index until the site owner checks the live examples and deliberately publishes them.